Alabama Board of Examiners of Landscape Architects v. Bostick

211 So. 3d 836, 2016 WL 3523306, 2016 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 151
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alabama Board of Examiners of Landscape Architects v. Bostick. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 155
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 10, 2016·No. 2130919·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

DONALDSON, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court reversing the judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Bostick, 211 So.3d 825 (Ala.2016). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alabama Board of Examiners of Landscape Architects v. Bostick, 211 So. 3d 836, 2016 WL 3523306, 2016 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 151 (Ala. Ct. App. 2016).

211 So. 3d 836 (Alabama Board of Examiners of Landscape Architects v. Bostick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alabama Board of Examiners of Landscape Architects v. Bostick
211 So. 3d 825 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2016)