Ala. Great Southern R.R. v. Smith

85 Ala. 208
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STONE, C. J.

The testimony of the engineer was to the effect, that the cow sprang on the track about fifty yards ahead of the train; that the animal was not, and could not be seen, before that time; and that when discovered, all the appliances known to skillful engineers could not have stopped the train in time to save the cow. If this be believed, it was a complete defense to the action. Charge number 2, given [209] at the instance of plaintiff, ignored this principle, and the testimony stated above, and must work a reversal of the judgment rendered. — E. T., Va. & Ga. R. R. Co. v. Bayliss, 75 Ala. 466; Same v. Deaver, 79 Ala. 216; Ala. Gr. So. R. R. Co. v. McAlpine, 80 Ala. 73; M. & G. R. R. Co. v. Caldwell, 83 Ala. 196.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ala. Great Southern R.R. v. Smith, 85 Ala. 208 (Ala. 1887).

85 Ala. 208 (Ala. Great Southern R.R. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.
125 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Geo. Pacific Railway Co. v. Hughes
87 Ala. 610 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)