Al-Shahrani v. Hudson Auto Traders, Inc.

110 A.D.3d 749, 972 N.Y.S.2d 902
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 9, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 110 A.D.3d 749 (Al-Shahrani v. Hudson Auto Traders, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Al-Shahrani v. Hudson Auto Traders, Inc., 110 A.D.3d 749, 972 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, in effect, to rescind a contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated July 18, 2012, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

“ ‘It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal’ ” (Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone, 108 AD3d 620, 620 [2013], quoting Gaffney v Gaffney, 29 AD3d 857, 857 [2006]; see Fernald v Vinci, 13 AD3d 333, 334 [2004]). “An appellant’s record on appeal must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court” (Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone, 108 AD3d at 620; see CPLR 5526; Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d 494, 495 [2002]). “ ‘Appeals that are not based upon complete and proper records must be dismissed’ ” (Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone, 108 AD3d at 620, quoting Garnerville Holding Co. v IMC Mgt., 299 AD2d 450, 450 [2002]).

Here, the plaintiff failed to include in the record on appeal the papers submitted by the defendant in support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which are necessary for this Court to render an informed decision on the merits (see Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone, 108 AD3d at 620-621; Gurwitz v French, 90 AD3d 840, 840-841 [2011]; Block 6222 Constr. Corp. v Sobhani, 84 AD3d 1292, 1292 [2011]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Congregation K'hal Torath Chaim, Inc. v. Rockland County Bd. of Health
2017 NY Slip Op 2419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
425 East 26th Street Owners Corp. v. Beaton
128 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Elgart v. Berezovsky
123 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.3d 749, 972 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-shahrani-v-hudson-auto-traders-inc-nyappdiv-2013.