Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Co. v. Wayne Black & Associates, Inc.

139 So. 3d 364, 2014 WL 1622052, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 2014·No. No. 3D13-822·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Andrew H. Boros, P.A. v. Arnold P. Carter, M.D., P.A., 537 So.2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (“Generally, an attorney serves as agent for his client; the attorney’s acts are the acts of the principal, the client.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Co. v. Wayne Black & Associates, Inc., 139 So. 3d 364, 2014 WL 1622052, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

139 So. 3d 364 (Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Co. v. Wayne Black & Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrew H. Boros, Pa v. Arnold P. Carter, Md, Pa
537 So. 2d 1134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)