Al-Qahtani v. Bush
This text of Al-Qahtani v. Bush (Al-Qahtani v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ ) MOHAMMED AL-QAHTANI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-1971 (PLF) ) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On March 8, 2022, the United States government notified the Court that it had
relinquished custody of petitioner Mohammed Al-Qahtani from the United States Naval Base in
Guantanamo Bay and transferred him to the custody and control of the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. Notice of Transfer [Dkt. No. 429]. On March 25, 2022, in response to the Court’s
March 9, 2022 Minute Order, the parties filed separate status reports indicating their views of
this case in light of this development. Respondents assert that the transfer of Mr. Al-Qahtani to
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia rendered any claims in this action moot and recommend that the
Court therefore dismiss this case in its entirety as moot. See Respondents’ Status Report
Pursuant to Order of March 18, 2022 [Dkt. No. 433]. Mr. Al-Qahtani does not contest that
recommendation but notes that the parties continue to dispute the designation of three
unclassified documents as “protected information” under the Protective Order [Dkt. No. 62]. See
Petitioner’s Status Report [Dkt. No. 434] at 2. He effectively asks the Court to grant the parties
additional time to meet and confer about the documents and, if necessary, to resolve the parties’
dispute before dismissing the case as moot. See id. at 5. Respondents’ relinquishment of custody of Mr. Al-Qahtani to the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia rendered his case moot. See Gul v. Obama, 652 F.3d 12, 17 (D.C. Cir. 2011)
(noting that for a former Guantanamo detainee “to keep his petition from becoming moot upon
his release,” he must “make an actual showing his prior detention or continued designation
burdens him with ‘concrete injuries’” (quoting Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998))); see
also Qassim v. Bush, 466 F.3d 1073, 1078 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (“[F]or a court to exercise habeas
jurisdiction over a petitioner no longer in custody, the petitioner must demonstrate that he was in
custody at the time he filed the petition and that his subsequent release has not rendered the
petition moot, i.e., that he continues to present a case or controversy under Article III, [Section] 2
of the Constitution.” (quoting Zalawadia v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 292, 297 (5th Cir. 2004))). The
Court therefore will dismiss Mr. Al-Qahtani’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus as moot and
will deny all remaining pending motions as moot.
To the extent Mr. Al-Qahtani asks to reserve his rights to seek adjudication of any
“protected information” designation disputes and to submit to the privilege team materials and
information associated with this case for classification review or for declassification, see
Protective Order [Dkt. No. 62] ¶¶ 10, 19, 34, 47, the Court hereby recognizes that those rights
are reserved. In addition, the Court recognizes respondents’ right to oppose any such requests by
Mr. Al-Qahtani on any applicable ground.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Mr. Al-Qahtani’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Dkt.
No. 1] is DISMISSED as moot. All remaining pending motions in this case are DENIED as
moot. The Clerk of Court shall remove this case from the docket of this Court. This is a final
appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a); it is
2 FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Al-Qahtani’s rights to seek adjudication of any
“protected information” designation disputes and to submit to the privilege team materials and
information associated with this case for classification review or for declassification under the
Protective Order [Dkt. No. 62] are RESERVED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ right to oppose any such requests by
Mr. Al-Qahtani on any available ground is RESERVED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ _______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: March 29, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Al-Qahtani v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-qahtani-v-bush-dcd-2022.