Al Patterson v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 2023·No. 05-22-01303-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered January 20, 2023

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01303-CR

AL PATTERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F20-76751-J

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to substitute counsel. When an

attorney substitutes for a withdrawing attorney, Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(d)

requires the withdrawing attorney to comply with Rule 6.5(b), which provides,

“The motion must be delivered to the party in person or mailed–both by certified

and by first-class mail–to the party at the party’s last known address.” TEX. R.

APP. P. 6.5(b). The motion does not show compliance with Rule 6.5(b).

Accordingly, we DENY the motion to substitute counsel without prejudice to the filing of a motion that complies with Rule 6.5. We DIRECT the Clerk to list

Kristen R. Brown and Meredith Belgooy as counsel of record for appellant. All

future correspondence shall be sent to Ms. Brown and Ms. Belgooey at the

addresses on file with the Court.

The reporter’s record is due FEBRUARY 9, 2023.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al Patterson v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Al Patterson v. the State of Texas (Al Patterson v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.