Al Hayes v. Joseph Mott, Leonard Gross, John Nichols, Richard Ebert, Mark Moore, Charles Gaskill and Charles Hall
This text of Al Hayes v. Joseph Mott, Leonard Gross, John Nichols, Richard Ebert, Mark Moore, Charles Gaskill and Charles Hall (Al Hayes v. Joseph Mott, Leonard Gross, John Nichols, Richard Ebert, Mark Moore, Charles Gaskill and Charles Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-09-00311-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
AL HAYES, ' APPEAL FROM THE 402ND APPELLANT
V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF
JOSEPH MOTT, LEONARD GROSS, JOHN NICHOLS, RICHARD EBERT, ' WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS MARK MOORE, CHARLES GASKILL AND CHARLES HALL, APPELLEES MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant, Al Hays, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In his motion, Hays states that he no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The motion includes a “Certificate of Agreement” signed by counsel for Appellees, Joseph Mott, Leonard Gross, John Nichols, Richard Ebert, Mark Moore, Charles Gaskill, and Charles Hall. Because Hays has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. As requested by Hays in his motion, the costs of this appeal are assessed against the party incurring them. Opinion delivered November 12, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Al Hayes v. Joseph Mott, Leonard Gross, John Nichols, Richard Ebert, Mark Moore, Charles Gaskill and Charles Hall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-hayes-v-joseph-mott-leonard-gross-john-nichols--texapp-2009.