Al Halmandy v. Bush
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) AL HALMANDY, et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-2385 (ESH) ) BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
Before the Court is [160] respondents’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to hold case in
abeyance for petitioners Saki Bacha (a.k.a. Mohammed Jawad) (ISN 900) and Mohammed
Kameen (ISN 1045), [196] petitioner Jawad’s opposition thereto, and [205] respondents’ reply.
Since respondents filed their motion, the military commission proceedings have been
suspended. As a result, petitioners cannot exhaust their criminal proceedings without suffering
delay. See Order, Al-Dharbi v. Obama, No. 05-cv-2371, Dkt. No. 135 (April 7, 2009); Order,
Alsawam v. Obama, No. 05-cv-1244, Dkt No. 150 (April 15, 2009); also Boumediene v. Bush,
128 S. Ct. 2229, 2275 (2008) (requiring “prompt” adjudication of Guantanamo detainees’ habeas
cases). Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that respondents’ motion is DENIED without prejudice. Respondents may
re-file the motion, if appropriate, if the charges sworn against petitioners are referred to a
military commission. It is further
ORDERED that a status conference for petitioner Bacha is set for April 27, 2009, at
10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 14. SO ORDERED.
_________/s/______________ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge
Date: April 22, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Al Halmandy v. Bush (Al Halmandy v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.