Al-Haj v. State

932 S.W.2d 519, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1996 WL 639760
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 1996·No. No. 429-96·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant pled guilty to the offense of delivery of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at six years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Al-Haj v. State, 916 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly addressed appellant’s second point of error. After careful review of the appellate record, Court of Appeals’ opinion, as well as the briefs and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed. Tex. R.App.Pro. 202(k).

Petition for Discretionary Review Dismissed.

CLINTON, J., concurs. WHITE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al-Haj v. State, 932 S.W.2d 519, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1996 WL 639760 (Tex. 1996).

932 S.W.2d 519 (Al-Haj v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Taylor
266 S.W.3d 553 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
State v. Marshall Scott Taylor
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008
Campbell v. State
118 S.W.3d 788 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)