Al-Haj v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Al-Haj v. State

932 S.W.2d 519, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1996 WL 639760

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 6, 1996

DocketNo. 429-96

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 932 S.W.2d 519 (Al-Haj v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Al-Haj v. State, 932 S.W.2d 519, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1996 WL 639760 (Tex. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant pled guilty to the offense of delivery of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at six years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Al-Haj v. State, 916 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly addressed appellant’s second point of error. After careful review of the appellate record, Court of Appeals’ opinion, as well as the briefs and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed. Tex. R.App.Pro. 202(k).

Petition for Discretionary Review Dismissed.

CLINTON, J., concurs. WHITE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant pled guilty to the offense of delivery of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at six years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Al-Haj v. State, 916 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly addressed appellant’s second point of error. After careful review of the appellate record, Court of Appeals’ opinion, as well as the briefs and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed. Tex. R.App.Pro. 202(k).

Petition for Discretionary Review Dismissed.

CLINTON, J., concurs. WHITE, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 S.W.2d 519, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1996 WL 639760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-haj-v-state-texcrimapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack