Al Fuchs Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Al Fuchs Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 446, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1954

United States Customs Court·Decided April 8, 1954·No. No. 57974; protest 72014-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United Stales (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained as to entry 75082. The protest having been abandoned as to entry 74476, same was dismissed as to said entry.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra, insofar as entry 75082 was concerned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United Stales (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained as to entry 75082. The protest having been abandoned as to entry 74476, same was dismissed as to said entry.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra, insofar as entry 75082 was concerned.

Al Fuchs Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 446, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1954 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 446 (Al Fuchs Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related