Al Darby v. Bush
This text of Al Darby v. Bush (Al Darby v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) AHMAD MOHAMMAD AL DARBI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil Action No. 05-2371 (RCL) v. ) ) BARACK OBAMA, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s unopposed motion [236] to suspend briefing schedule,
it is hereby ORDERED that the request is GRANTED. It is further
1. ORDERED that Petitioner’s counsel will notify Respondents’ counsel
when the issues necessitating the suspension are resolved, and the parties will
work together to set and present the Court a mutually agreeable briefing
schedule at that time; it is further
2. ORDERED that Petitioner will not file his traverse until at least thirty
day have passed from the date on which Petitioner’s counsel notifies
Respondents’ counsel that the issues necessitating the suspension have been
resolved; it is further
3. ORDERED that Petitioner’s counsel shall be permitted to continue to
conduct expert discovery regardless of the suspension of the briefing schedule.
SO ORDERED.
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on February 9, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Al Darby v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-darby-v-bush-dcd-2011.