A.L. Coppock v. Paul K. Rowe Darral Steele William Smith Otho Eyster Thomas Badger Lyle Castel Theresa Bemiller Knox County City of Mount Vernon

861 F.2d 719, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14444, 1988 WL 113289
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 1988
Docket88-3923
StatusUnpublished

This text of 861 F.2d 719 (A.L. Coppock v. Paul K. Rowe Darral Steele William Smith Otho Eyster Thomas Badger Lyle Castel Theresa Bemiller Knox County City of Mount Vernon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.L. Coppock v. Paul K. Rowe Darral Steele William Smith Otho Eyster Thomas Badger Lyle Castel Theresa Bemiller Knox County City of Mount Vernon, 861 F.2d 719, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14444, 1988 WL 113289 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

861 F.2d 719

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
A.L. COPPOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paul K. ROWE; Darral Steele; William Smith; Otho Eyster;
Thomas Badger; Lyle Castel; Theresa Bemiller;
Knox County; City of Mount Vernon,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3923.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 1988.

Before MERRITT, BOYCE F. MARTIN Jr. and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the file indicates that the magistrate entered an order on September 2, 1988, granting Coppock's motion for extension of time until October 17, 1988, to answer the defendants' motions. Plaintiff appealed from that order on September 26, 1988.

This court lacks jurisdiction in the appeal. An order of the magistrate is not appealable unless the magistrate is given plenary jurisdiction by the district court and by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(1). Ambrose v. Welch, 729 F.2d 1084, 1085 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); Trufant v. Autocon, Inc., 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir.1984) (per curiam). The magistrate was not given plenary jurisdiction in this case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal be and is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 F.2d 719, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14444, 1988 WL 113289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-coppock-v-paul-k-rowe-darral-steele-william-smith-otho-eyster-thomas-ca6-1988.