Al-Baluchi v. Gates
This text of Al-Baluchi v. Gates (Al-Baluchi v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F l L E D
OCT ~1 2009
NANCY MAYER WH|THNGTON, CLERK U.S. D|STR|CT COURT
AMMAR AL-BALUCHI, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 08-2083 (PLF)
V.
ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense, et al.,
Respondents.
`/L/\./\/§&§\J\/\_/SS
ORDER
HAVING CONSIDERED Respondents’ Un0pposed Motion for Extension of Time to -» 0 » m File Response to Motion for Misce11aneous Relief, it is hereby this _:_) day of S er, 2009, ORDERED that the Government shall f11e its response to Attomey Scott L. Fenstermaker’s
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Dkt. No. 83) on or before October 5, 2009.
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Al-Baluchi v. Gates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-baluchi-v-gates-dcd-2009.