Al-Amin v. Allen
222 F. App'x 346
Opinion
Rashid Qawi Al-Amin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Al-Amin v. Allen, No. 2:05-cv-00672-RAJ (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2006). We deny AlAmin’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Al-Amin v. Allen, 222 F. App'x 346 (4th Cir. 2007).
222 F. App'x 346 (Al-Amin v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983