Al-Adahi v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 31, 2009·No. Civil Action No. 2005-0280·Published

Opinion

UNCLASSIFIEOIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED AL-ADAHI, et al"

Petitioners,

v. Civil Action No. 05-280 (GK)

SARACK H. OBAMA, et al.,

Respondents,

QRDER

A Status Conference was held in this case on March 25, 2009,

which took place in part in open court and in part in a sealed

courtroom due to the discussion of classified information. l Upon

consideration of Petitioner Hamdoun's Motion for Discovery Under Section l.E.2 of the Case Management Order [Dkt. Nos. 297], the opposition, Reply, representations of the parties, and the entire record herein,2 it is hereby]

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 1 is granted in part and

In addition to scheduling issues, there were three ripe discovery motions before the Court; one motion was filed on the public docket, while two others were classified. On March 26, 2009, the Court issued a public Order resolving the unclassified motion. The Court resolves portions of the classified motions in this Order. The remainder of the discovery issues will be resolved after the Court hears from parties at the next Status Conference. Any mention herein of "consolidated files" refers to the JTF-GTMO/OARDEC files. Unless otherwise specified, all matters in the Document Request are included in the Court's Order.

UNCLASSIFIEOIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

denied in part. The Government certified that it has produced all

but one of the seven intelligence reports requested by the

Petitioner. For that one remaining report, the Government will report by March 30, 2009, on its ability to locate and provide the document. The Government is not required to produce Petitioner's drawing of the house in which he was captured, since it is not relevant to the legality of his detention. Finally, the Government certified that any records created of Petitioner's interrogations during the weeks in question would have been produced as part of the Government's obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence. Petitioner is permitted to submit an interrogatory to determine if any evidence pertaining to the

interrogations during this time period might exist in a database outside of the JTF-GTMO!OARDEC ("consolidated files"); and i t is further ORDERED, that Document Request No. 2 is granted in part. To

the extent that the Government has not already done so as part of its production of exculpatory evidence, it shall produce interrogation logs or plans for those interrogations of the Petitioner that elicited statements upon which the Government relies to justify its detention; and it is further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 3 is denied, because the

Government represented that it has met this request in fulfilling its obligation to produce exculpatory information; and it is

-2­

UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNCLASSIFIEOIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 4 is denied without

prejudice, because it sweeps too broadly. Petitioners may, if they

choose, amend their request to narrow. what they ask of the

Government. Such an amended request should be limited to

information related to the Government's knowledge of promises or

requests made to individuals whose confessions, if given, the

Government relies on to justify detention; and it is further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 5 is denied, because the

Government represents that it does not have the item in its

possession, according to a document that itemizes the _

1IIIIIIII found on Petitioner when he entered Guantanamo Bay; and it

is further

ORDERED, that Document Requests No. 6 and No. 7 are granted.

The Government will conduct a search for the

If they are able to locate the _ they will allow the

Petitioner to inspect it. If they are able to locate thellllllllll

they will produce a copy of it; and it is.further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 8 is denied, because it

sweeps too broadly, and it is further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 9 is granted in part and

denied in part without prejudice. The Government shall produce

Petitioner's medical records for the first four months that

Petitioner was detained at Guantanamo Bay. Petitioner is permitted

-3­

UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

to request at a later time records that pertain to time frames for

which he can justify a particular concern; and it is further ORDERED, that Document Requests No. 10 and No. 11 are denied

without prejudice, in view of the fact that the Government certified that it has satisfied this request in fulfilling its

obligation to produce exculpatory information; and it is further

ORDERED, that Document Requests No. 13 and No. 14 are granted

in part and. denied in part. The Government must produce any

documents or other information that relate to any formal requirements or procedures for becoming a .member of Al Qaida; and it is further ORDERED, that Document Request No. 15 is denied, because it

requests information that is too remote from any that the

Government uses to justify detention; and it is further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 16 is denied, because it

sweeps too broadly; and it is further ORDERED, that Document Request No. 17 is granted. If the

Government is in possession of the video or video stills, it must produce a copy to the Petitioner; and it is further

-4­

UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 18 is denied, because it is

not relevant; and it is further

ORDERED, that Document Request No. 19 is granted; and it is

ORDERED, that a Status Conference shall be held on April 1,

2009, at 10:30 a.m.

MarCh!i2, 2009 ISIG~~ Gladys Kessler United States District Judge

Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF

-5­

UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al-Adahi v. Bush, (D.D.C. 2009).

Al-Adahi v. Bush (Al-Adahi v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.