Akzo Salt, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.

1996 Ohio 434, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1223

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 1223.]

AKZO SALT, INC., APPELLANT, v. ADMR., OHIO BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, APPELLEE. [Cite as Akzo Salt, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv., 1996-Ohio-434.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1253—Submitted May 22, 1996—Decided July 3, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 67221. __________________ Willacy & LoPresti, Timothy A. Marcovy, Aubrey B. Willacy and M. Scott Young, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Betsey Nims Friedman and Frank J. Reed, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________