Akwasi Acheampong v. Jefferson Sessions III

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2018
Docket18-1233
StatusUnpublished

This text of Akwasi Acheampong v. Jefferson Sessions III (Akwasi Acheampong v. Jefferson Sessions III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akwasi Acheampong v. Jefferson Sessions III, (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1233

AKWASI ACHEAMPONG, a/k/a Charles Boateng,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 20, 2018 Decided: October 15, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mariam Masumi Daud, JOHNSON & MASUMI, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Lisa Morinelli, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Akwasi Acheampong, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reconsider the agency’s

previous denial of his motion to reopen sua sponte. We have reviewed the administrative

record and Acheampong’s claims and conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review how

the agency exercises its sua sponte discretion. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198,

206-07 (4th Cir. 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). We

accordingly dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mosere v. Mukasey
552 F.3d 397 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Garfield Lawrence v. Loretta Lynch
826 F.3d 198 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Akwasi Acheampong v. Jefferson Sessions III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akwasi-acheampong-v-jefferson-sessions-iii-ca4-2018.