Aktieselskabet Banan v. Hoadley

60 F. 447, 9 C.C.A. 61, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are not inclined to give as much weight to the various items of documentary evidence as did the learned district judge. Upon the oral testimony-of the witnesses, however, who were all examined before him, there was such conflict on the single issue of fact involved in the case that his decision thereon should not he reversed, in the absence of any new proof or of manifest error, neither of which is shown here. Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.