Aktieselskabet Banan v. Hoadley

Second Circuit

Aktieselskabet Banan v. Hoadley

60 F. 447, 9 C.C.A. 61, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 1894

DocketNo. 67

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 F. 447 (Aktieselskabet Banan v. Hoadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aktieselskabet Banan v. Hoadley, 60 F. 447, 9 C.C.A. 61, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100 (2d Cir. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are not inclined to give as much weight to the various items of documentary evidence as did the learned district judge. Upon the oral testimony-of the witnesses, however, who were all examined before him, there was such conflict on the single issue of fact involved in the case that his decision thereon should not he reversed, in the absence of any new proof or of manifest error, neither of which is shown here. Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are not inclined to give as much weight to the various items of documentary evidence as did the learned district judge. Upon the oral testimony-of the witnesses, however, who were all examined before him, there was such conflict on the single issue of fact involved in the case that his decision thereon should not he reversed, in the absence of any new proof or of manifest error, neither of which is shown here. Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. 447, 9 C.C.A. 61, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aktieselskabet-banan-v-hoadley-ca2-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack