A.K.S. Jewelry Manufacturing Corp. v. Doras Distributor, Inc.
This text of 210 A.D.2d 35 (A.K.S. Jewelry Manufacturing Corp. v. Doras Distributor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, [36]*36Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Ryan, Jr., J.), entered November 1, 1993, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the total sum of $134,139.50, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendant payor bank received the subject check from the depositary bank, but did not act on it within the time required by UCC 4-302. Accordingly, the delay was tantamount to final payment of the check (see, SOS Oil Corp. v Norstar Bank, 76 NY2d 561, 567) and defendant is liable. That plaintiff may also have a cause of action against the collecting bank for the alleged improper debiting of plaintiff’s account is of no avail to defendant (see, e.g., Corsica Livestock Sales v Sumitomo Bank, 726 F2d 374). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Kupferman, Asch and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 A.D.2d 35, 619 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aks-jewelry-manufacturing-corp-v-doras-distributor-inc-nyappdiv-1994.