Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy

371 U.S. 35, 83 S. Ct. 145

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 22, 1962·No. 327·Published

Opinion

371 U.S. 35 (1962)

CITY OF AKRON ET AL.
v.
OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.

No. 327.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 22, 1962. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

371 U.S. 35 (1962)

CITY OF AKRON ET AL.
v.
OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.

No. 327.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 22, 1962. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy, 371 U.S. 35, 83 S. Ct. 145 (1962).

Pincite

371 U.S. 35 (Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.