Home/Supreme Court/Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy

Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy

371 U.S. 35, 83 S. Ct. 145
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 22, 1962
Docket327
StatusPublished

This text of 371 U.S. 35 (Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akron v. Ohio Ex Rel. McElroy, 371 U.S. 35, 83 S. Ct. 145 (1962).

Opinion

371 U.S. 35 (1962)

CITY OF AKRON ET AL.
v.
OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.

No. 327.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 22, 1962.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 U.S. 35, 83 S. Ct. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-v-ohio-ex-rel-mcelroy-scotus-1962.