Akron v. Kirby
This text of 1997 Ohio 205 (Akron v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 1220.]
CITY OF AKRON, APPELLEE, v. KIRBY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Akron v. Kirby, 1997-Ohio-205.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-838—Submitted April 1, 1997—Decided May 14, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 17307. __________________ Douglas J. Powley, Chief City Prosecutor, and Charles R. Quinn, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee. Edmund M. Sawan, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Ohio 205, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-v-kirby-ohio-1997.