Akron Standard Mold Co. v. Coe
125 F.2d 203, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 171, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 153, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4341
Opinion
In our opinion, appellant has failed, on this appeal, to demonstrate that the findings of the District Court are wrong,1 or to overcome the presumption of correctness which follows the decision of the Patent Office.2
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akron Standard Mold Co. v. Coe, 125 F.2d 203, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 171, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 153, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4341 (D.C. Cir. 1942).
125 F.2d 203 (Akron Standard Mold Co. v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abbott v. Coe
109 F.2d 449 (D.C. Circuit, 1939)
Standard Cap & Seal Corp. v. Coe
124 F.2d 278 (D.C. Circuit, 1941)