Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls

1999 Ohio 150, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1207
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 28, 1999·No. 1998-2122·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 1207.]

AKRON HYDROELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 1999-Ohio-150.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-2122—Submitted June 9, 1999—Decided July 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 18849. __________________ Richard K. Wilcox, for appellant. Virgil Arrington, Jr., Deputy Law Director, for appellee city of Cuyahoga Falls. Brouse & McDowell and J. Bruce Hunsicker, for appellee Powerhouse at Water’s Edge, Ltd. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 1999 Ohio 150, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1207 (Ohio 1999).

1999 Ohio 150 (Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.