Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 1207.]
AKRON HYDROELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 1999-Ohio-150.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-2122—Submitted June 9, 1999—Decided July 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 18849. __________________ Richard K. Wilcox, for appellant. Virgil Arrington, Jr., Deputy Law Director, for appellee city of Cuyahoga Falls. Brouse & McDowell and J. Bruce Hunsicker, for appellee Powerhouse at Water’s Edge, Ltd. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1999 Ohio 150 (Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.