Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United States
284 U.S. 575, 76 L. Ed. 499, 52 S. Ct. 26, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 484
Opinion
The Court is of the opinion that the Interstate Commerce Commission acted within its authority and that its order is supported by substantial evidence. The decree is affirmed. Western Chemical Co. v. United States, 271 U. S. 268, 271; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. United States, 274 U. S. 29, 33, 34; Alabama v. United States, 283 U. S. 776, 779.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United States, 284 U.S. 575, 76 L. Ed. 499, 52 S. Ct. 26, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 484 (1931).
284 U.S. 575 (Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. Greenwich Water Co.
83 A.2d 177 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1951)
Missouri Pacific R. v. United States
293 U.S. 524 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Ex Parte Savannah River Electric Co.
168 S.E. 554 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1933)