Akron, C. & YR Co. v. Frozen Food Express
This text of 355 U.S. 6 (Akron, C. & YR Co. v. Frozen Food Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258.
Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263.
Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270.
Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 263, American Trucking Associations, Inc., v. Frozen Food Express, and No. 270, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeals from the same court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 U.S. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-c-yr-co-v-frozen-food-express-scotus-1957.