Akron Bar Ass'n v. Walker

472 N.E.2d 334, 15 Ohio St. 3d 31, 15 Ohio B. 70, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1256
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 26, 1984
DocketD.D. No. 84-24
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 472 N.E.2d 334 (Akron Bar Ass'n v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Walker, 472 N.E.2d 334, 15 Ohio St. 3d 31, 15 Ohio B. 70, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1256 (Ohio 1984).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a review of the record, we find that respondent has violated all three Disciplinary Rules cited by the board of commissioners. We find further that such conduct warrants more than a mere public reprimand.

Therefore, the court hereby suspends the respondent, Donald L. Walker, from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Walker
891 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 N.E.2d 334, 15 Ohio St. 3d 31, 15 Ohio B. 70, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-bar-assn-v-walker-ohio-1984.