Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jaynes

436 N.E.2d 1359, 70 Ohio St. 2d 276
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1982
DocketD.D. No. 82-10
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 436 N.E.2d 1359 (Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jaynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jaynes, 436 N.E.2d 1359, 70 Ohio St. 2d 276 (Ohio 1982).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR9-102(B)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and the recommendation of a one-year suspension from the practice of law.

Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morton
450 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 N.E.2d 1359, 70 Ohio St. 2d 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-bar-assn-v-jaynes-ohio-1982.