Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jaynes

436 N.E.2d 1359, 70 Ohio St. 2d 276
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1982·No. D.D. No. 82-10·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR9-102(B)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and the recommendation of a one-year suspension from the practice of law.

Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jaynes, 436 N.E.2d 1359, 70 Ohio St. 2d 276 (Ohio 1982).

436 N.E.2d 1359 (Akron Bar Ass'n v. Jaynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morton
450 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)