Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti
658 N.E.2d 250, 74 Ohio St. 3d 204
Opinion
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6). We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Respondent is therefore suspended for two years from the practice of law in Ohio; however, we suspend both years of the sanction period and place respondent on probation under the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti, 658 N.E.2d 250, 74 Ohio St. 3d 204 (Ohio 1996).
658 N.E.2d 250 (Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Akron Bar Assn. v. Meyer
1999 Ohio 3 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Akron Bar Assn. v. Bonetti
1998 Ohio 493 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)