Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar

704 N.E.2d 236, 84 Ohio St. 3d 372
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1311
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 704 N.E.2d 236 (Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar, 704 N.E.2d 236, 84 Ohio St. 3d 372 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Because respondent has terminated his probate practice and because in this instance his conduct did not result in improper gain to him or financial harm to his client, we impose a lesser sanction than the board recommended. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the entire six months stayed. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelley
2001 Ohio 1317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelley
755 N.E.2d 338 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Akron Bar Assn. v. Bodnar
2000 Ohio 97 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 N.E.2d 236, 84 Ohio St. 3d 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-bar-assn-v-bodnar-ohio-1999.