Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar
704 N.E.2d 236, 84 Ohio St. 3d 372
Opinion
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Because respondent has terminated his probate practice and because in this instance his conduct did not result in improper gain to him or financial harm to his client, we impose a lesser sanction than the board recommended. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the entire six months stayed. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar, 704 N.E.2d 236, 84 Ohio St. 3d 372 (Ohio 1999).
704 N.E.2d 236 (Akron Bar Ass'n. v. Bodnar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelley
2001 Ohio 1317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelley
755 N.E.2d 338 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Akron Bar Assn. v. Bodnar
2000 Ohio 97 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)