Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron

707 N.E.2d 850, 85 Ohio St. 3d 167
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 24, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2215
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 707 N.E.2d 850 (Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron, 707 N.E.2d 850, 85 Ohio St. 3d 167 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Practicing law while under suspension for failure to meet continuing legal education requirements and pay the imposed fine warranted indefinite suspension in Toledo Bar Assn. v. Christensen (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 71, [168]*168671 N.E.2d 30, and such a sanction is also warranted in this case. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice- of law in Ohio and remains subject to the conditions of our order of June 18, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisler
34 N.E.3d 99 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Seabrook
2012 Ohio 3933 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Woodley
2012 Ohio 2458 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman
2010 Ohio 3824 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Higgins
117 Ohio St. 3d 473 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Crandall
786 N.E.2d 872 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 N.E.2d 850, 85 Ohio St. 3d 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-bar-assn-v-barron-ohio-1999.