Akrivos v. State

464 So. 2d 1355, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12994
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1985·No. No. 84-690·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue presented for review here is whether the circumstances were sufficient to justify the police officer’s actions in detaining the appellant and requiring her to produce her motor vehicle registration, based upon a “founded suspicion.” We think they were not and reverse, on the authority of Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. Beja, 451 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); State v. Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

HERSEY, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akrivos v. State, 464 So. 2d 1355, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12994 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

464 So. 2d 1355 (Akrivos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Upshaw v. State
464 So. 2d 1355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)