Akridge v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Akridge v. City of Atlanta

77 S.E. 101, 12 Ga. App. 252, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 521

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 11, 1913

Docket4126

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 101 (Akridge v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akridge v. City of Atlanta, 77 S.E. 101, 12 Ga. App. 252, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

Irrespective of the question as to the admissibility of evidence which it is insisted should have been excluded upon the ground that it was obtained by illegal seizure and search of the defendant’s person, and without regard to the admissibility of -the copy of the revenue . license, the other circumstances proved in the case compel the conclusion that the defendant was guilty of a violation of the municipal ordinance. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

Irrespective of the question as to the admissibility of evidence which it is insisted should have been excluded upon the ground that it was obtained by illegal seizure and search of the defendant’s person, and without regard to the admissibility of -the copy of the revenue . license, the other circumstances proved in the case compel the conclusion that the defendant was guilty of a violation of the municipal ordinance. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.E. 101, 12 Ga. App. 252, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akridge-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1913.