Akridge v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
47 S.E. 904, 120 Ga. 338, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 543
Opinion
While the evidence in behalf of the plaintiff was not sufficient to have required a verdict in his behalf, it was sufficient to have supported such a verdict, if rendered, and it was, therefore, erroneous to grant a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akridge v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 47 S.E. 904, 120 Ga. 338, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 543 (Ga. 1904).
47 S.E. 904 (Akridge v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Youmans v. Moore
74 S.E. 710 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)