Akins v. York Officers' & Employees' Retirement Board
This text of 81 A.2d 883 (Akins v. York Officers' & Employees' Retirement Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The question involved on this appeal is the same as in the case of Altieri v. Allentown Officers’ and Employees’ Retirement Board, p. 176 ante. The result in the lower court in the instant case is opposite to that reached in the Altieri case. In this case the learned court below sustained the defendant board’s contention that Section 4(b) of the Third Class City Employees Retirement Law of May 23,1945, P.L. 903, violates Sections 11 and 18 of Article III of the Pennsylvania Constitution and, accordingly, entered judgment for the board. The plaintiff-employee thereupon brought this appeal. As we pointed out in the Altieri case, supra, the constitutional questions need not be considered in view of the fact that Section 4(b) is deficient and unenforceable. For the reasons set forth in the Altieri case, we approve the judgment entered in the instant case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A.2d 883, 368 Pa. 182, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akins-v-york-officers-employees-retirement-board-pa-1951.