Akins v. York Officers' & Employees' Retirement Board

81 A.2d 883, 368 Pa. 182, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 461
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 27, 1951·No. Appeal, No. 25·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

The question involved on this appeal is the same as in the case of Altieri v. Allentown Officers’ and Employees’ Retirement Board, p. 176 ante. The result in the lower court in the instant case is opposite to that reached in the Altieri case. In this case the learned court below sustained the defendant board’s contention that Section 4(b) of the Third Class City Employees Retirement Law of May 23,1945, P.L. 903, violates Sections 11 and 18 of Article III of the Pennsylvania Constitution and, accordingly, entered judgment for the board. The plaintiff-employee thereupon brought this appeal. As we pointed out in the Altieri case, supra, the constitutional questions need not be considered in view of the fact that Section 4(b) is deficient and unenforceable. For the reasons set forth in the Altieri case, we approve the judgment entered in the instant case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akins v. York Officers' & Employees' Retirement Board, 81 A.2d 883, 368 Pa. 182, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 461 (Pa. 1951).

81 A.2d 883 (Akins v. York Officers' & Employees' Retirement Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. Minehart
241 A.2d 745 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Ellison v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance
229 A.2d 482 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Rhoades v. Abington Township School District
226 A.2d 53 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Kurtz v. Erie
133 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)