Akins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Akins v. State

1917 OK CR 165, 165 P. 154, 13 Okla. Crim. 736, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 115

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 9, 1917

DocketNo. A-2588.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 165 (Akins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akins v. State, 1917 OK CR 165, 165 P. 154, 13 Okla. Crim. 736, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 115 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, George Akins, and T. F. Akins and Everett Brenneman, were jointly informed against and tried upon an information Charging the larceny of 20 chickens, of the value of $10, the property of A. J. R. Smith. At the trial the court sustained a motion to advise the jury to acquit the defendants T. F. Akins and Everett Brenneman, and so instructed the jury. The jury by their verdict found the plaintiff in error guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for a period of 10 days and a fine of $10. From the judgment rendered upon the verdict, an appeal by case-made was perfected.

From a careful consideration of the record we reach the conclusion that there was before the jury sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict rendered, and, finding no error, the judgment of th lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, George Akins, and T. F. Akins and Everett Brenneman, were jointly informed against and tried upon an information Charging the larceny of 20 chickens, of the value of $10, the property of A. J. R. Smith. At the trial the court sustained a motion to advise the jury to acquit the defendants T. F. Akins and Everett Brenneman, and so instructed the jury. The jury by their verdict found the plaintiff in error guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for a period of 10 days and a fine of $10. From the judgment rendered upon the verdict, an appeal by case-made was perfected.

From a careful consideration of the record we reach the conclusion that there was before the jury sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict rendered, and, finding no error, the judgment of th lower court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 165, 165 P. 154, 13 Okla. Crim. 736, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akins-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.