Akins v. Priess

Missouri Court of Appeals

Akins v. Priess

470 S.W.3d 6, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 742, 2015 WL 4456236

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 21, 2015·No. No. ED 102071·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Marian Priess (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a bench trial granting an injunction enjoining Appellant from obstructing, impeding, or interfering with a thirteen-and-one-half-feet roadway easement and granting judgment in favor of Mildred Akins (“Respondent”) against Appellant in the amount of $4,980 for removal of rock outcroppings and trees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Marian Priess (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a bench trial granting an injunction enjoining Appellant from obstructing, impeding, or interfering with a thirteen-and-one-half-feet roadway easement and granting judgment in favor of Mildred Akins (“Respondent”) against Appellant in the amount of $4,980 for removal of rock outcroppings and trees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Akins v. Priess, 470 S.W.3d 6, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 742, 2015 WL 4456236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

470 S.W.3d 6 (Akins v. Priess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.