Akins v. Harco Insurance

106 Ohio St. 3d 41
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 27, 2005
DocketNo. 2004-1615
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 Ohio St. 3d 41 (Akins v. Harco Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akins v. Harco Insurance, 106 Ohio St. 3d 41 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal of Old Republic Insurance Company is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The discretionary appeal of Owners Insurance Company is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed insofar as it holds that extrinsic evidence may not be used to establish a valid offer of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Hollon v. Clary, 104 Ohio St.3d 526, 2004-Ohio-6772, 820 N.E.2d 881.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Akins v. Harco Ins., Unpublished Decision (9-12-2005)
2005 Ohio 4756 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 Ohio St. 3d 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akins-v-harco-insurance-ohio-2005.