Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1630
FRANCIS AKINRO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-01268-WDQ)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order
dismissing civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v.
Maryland Transit Admin., No. 1:10-cv-01268-WDQ (D. Md. May 27,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration (Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.