Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2010·No. 10-1630·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1630

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-01268-WDQ)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order

dismissing civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v.

Maryland Transit Admin., No. 1:10-cv-01268-WDQ (D. Md. May 27,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration, (4th Cir. 2010).

Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration (Akinro v. Maryland Transit Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)