Akinro v. Maher

Fourth Circuit

Akinro v. Maher

286 F. App'x 45

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2008·No. No. 08-6749·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case based on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Maher, No. 1:02-cv-00555-CCB (D.Md. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [46]*46presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case based on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Maher, No. 1:02-cv-00555-CCB (D.Md. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [46]*46presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Akinro v. Maher, 286 F. App'x 45 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

286 F. App'x 45 (Akinro v. Maher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related