Akinro v. Maher
This text of Akinro v. Maher (Akinro v. Maher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1311
FRANCIS AKINRO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA MAHER, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; GEORGE BUSH, President of the United States of America,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-555-CCB)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Francis Akinro, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm based on the
reasoning of the district court. See Akinro v. Maher, No. CA-02-
555-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 4, 2002). We deny Akinro’s motion for default
judgment. We also deny Akinro’s motion for oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Akinro v. Maher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akinro-v-maher-ca4-2002.