Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2010·No. 10-1707·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1707

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HERTZ CAR RENTAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01297-JFM)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Hertz Car

Rental, No. 1:10-cv-01297-JFM (D. Md. June 4, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental, (4th Cir. 2010).

Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental (Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.