Akinro v. Hecida Hotel

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2010·No. 10-1698·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1698

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HECIDA HOTEL; INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT; UCLA-HARBOR MEDICAL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01452-RDB)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Hecida Hotel,

No. 1:10-cv-01452-RDB (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akinro v. Hecida Hotel, (4th Cir. 2010).

Akinro v. Hecida Hotel (Akinro v. Hecida Hotel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.