Akinro v. Hecida Hotel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1698
FRANCIS AKINRO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HECIDA HOTEL; INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT; UCLA-HARBOR MEDICAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01452-RDB)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Hecida Hotel,
No. 1:10-cv-01452-RDB (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akinro v. Hecida Hotel (Akinro v. Hecida Hotel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.