Akinro v. City of Baltimore

Fourth Circuit

Akinro v. City of Baltimore

393 F. App'x 88

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2010·No. No. 10-1704·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Ahinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. City of Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-01491-BEL (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ai'e adequately [89]*89presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Ahinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. City of Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-01491-BEL (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ai'e adequately [89]*89presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Akinro v. City of Baltimore, 393 F. App'x 88 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 88 (Akinro v. City of Baltimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.