Akin v. State

307 S.W.2d 805, 165 Tex. Crim. 367, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2357
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 1957·No. No. 29,135·Published

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Art. 6687b, Subsection 4 of Sec. 32, Vernon’s R.C.S., makes it unlawful for one to fail or refuse to surrender to the Texas Department of Public Safety, on demand, any operator’s, commercial operator’s, or chauffeur’s license which has been suspended, cancelled, or revoked, as provided by law.

This is an appeal from a conviction for violating that statute, with punishment assessed at fifteen days’ confinement in jail and a fine of $100.

[368]*368It will be noted that the offense denounced by the statute is complete only when the Texas Department of Public Safety has first made demand that the license be surrendered.

It follows, therefore, that for an information to charge a violation of that statute there must be an allegation that a demand was made for the surrender of the license.

The instant information carries no such allegation, but charges only that the appellant did “ * * * * fail to return to the Department of Public Safety his Texas Operator’s License and registration after the same had been duly suspended by said Department.”

Upon its face, the information does not charge a violation of the law and is therefore insufficient to support a conviction.

What we have said here is not to be construed as a determination of the validity of the statute. That question is not reached or decided.

For the reason stated, the conviction is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akin v. State, 307 S.W.2d 805, 165 Tex. Crim. 367, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2357 (Tex. 1957).

307 S.W.2d 805 (Akin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.