Akin v. State
This text of 582 S.E.2d 566 (Akin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under tlie rule stated in Smith v. State, 46 Ga. App. 351 (167 S. E. 714), the evidence authorized the verdicts finding the defendant guilty of making liquor in one indictment and of possessing it as charged in another.
2. The defendant contends that the evidence merely shows that the de *583 fendant was present at the still; but it further appears that the still was in operation, and that the defendant fled when the presence of the officers became known. Evidence of another previous indictment with a plea of guilty thereon was admissible for the purpose of showing motive and intent; and the court so instructed the jury.
3. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 S.E.2d 566, 66 Ga. App. 582, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akin-v-state-gactapp-1942.