Akin v. Nolan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Akin v. Nolan

202 Ill. App. 157

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 27, 1916·No. Gen. No. 22,450·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

8. Gifts, § 27*—what assumed in suit ly lawyer to recover. In a suit by a lawyer to recover shares of stock made out in the name of the defendant and alleged to have been given her for safe keeping but not with the intention of passing title, held that it must be assumed that the complainant knew that an "indorsement was necessary to pass title to complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

8. Gifts, § 27*—what assumed in suit ly lawyer to recover. In a suit by a lawyer to recover shares of stock made out in the name of the defendant and alleged to have been given her for safe keeping but not with the intention of passing title, held that it must be assumed that the complainant knew that an "indorsement was necessary to pass title to complainant.

Akin v. Nolan, 202 Ill. App. 157 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

202 Ill. App. 157 (Akin v. Nolan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.