Akin v. Camp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Akin v. Camp

95 S.E. 315, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 106

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 13, 1918

Docket8930

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 315 (Akin v. Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akin v. Camp, 95 S.E. 315, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 106 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Akin as landlord and Camp as cropper undertook to make a crop beginning on January 1. In the following June a disagreement resulted in Camp’s surrendering the crop. Akin, in writing, agreed to pay him for his services one hundred dollars-in November, and to discharge him from all claims. Aki-n defaulted in the payment of the one hundred dollars, and Camp foreclosed a laborer’s lien on the crop. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and this ruling is excepted to. The charge of the court, which was full and fair, submitted the contentions of the parties; and the evidence of the defendant authorized, if it did not demand, a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Akin as landlord and Camp as cropper undertook to make a crop beginning on January 1. In the following June a disagreement resulted in Camp’s surrendering the crop. Akin, in writing, agreed to pay him for his services one hundred dollars-in November, and to discharge him from all claims. Aki-n defaulted in the payment of the one hundred dollars, and Camp foreclosed a laborer’s lien on the crop. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and this ruling is excepted to. The charge of the court, which was full and fair, submitted the contentions of the parties; and the evidence of the defendant authorized, if it did not demand, a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.E. 315, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akin-v-camp-gactapp-1918.