Akin v. Albany Northern Railroad

14 How. Pr. 337
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 14 How. Pr. 337 (Akin v. Albany Northern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akin v. Albany Northern Railroad, 14 How. Pr. 337 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

Opinion

Harris, Justice.

Civil actions, in the courts of record of this state, shall be commenced by the service of a summons.” This is the mandate of the legislature ; and I know of no other mode of bringing a party into court against his will. Until served with process, the court has no jurisdiction over him: [339]*339and yet, in this case, we have three persons made defendants in an action, and that action brought to trial, and final judgment rendered against them, without service of process, or any other notice except that an application would be. made for leave to sue them. *

The record of the judgment presents the anomaly of a suit commenced against one defendant, a complaint against the same defendant, and then a final judgment against three persons who are strangers to the pleadings: their names appear for the first time in the judgment. It needs but to state the facts to show that thé proceedings cannot be upheld.

Nor was the plaintiff in a situation to proceed to. trial upon the issue already joined. Having obtained leave to amend the-complaint, he was required to serve a copy of the amended complaint upon all the defendants. The effect of amending was, to strike out the issue that had been joined. It was the right of the defendant, who had already answered, to put in a new ° answer to the amended complaint. (See Ward agt. Dewey, 12 How. 193.)

' The motion to set aside the judgment must be granted, and the plaintiff’s motion denied. The plaintiff should be charged with the costs of one motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anaud-Blanco v. District Court of San Juan
35 P.R. 803 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1926)
Anaud Viuda de Blanco v. Muñoz
35 P.R. Dec. 874 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1926)
Heffern v. Hunt
8 A.D. 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Fassett v. Tallmadge
15 Abb. Pr. 205 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 How. Pr. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akin-v-albany-northern-railroad-nysupct-1856.