Akin Distributors, Inc. v. United States

394 U.S. 905, 89 S. Ct. 1013, 22 L. Ed. 2d 216, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2319

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 10, 1969

DocketNo. 980

StatusPublished

Cited by49 cases

This text of 394 U.S. 905 (Akin Distributors, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akin Distributors, Inc. v. United States, 394 U.S. 905, 89 S. Ct. 1013, 22 L. Ed. 2d 216, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2319 (1969).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Blankenship

170 S.W.3d 676 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

State v. Robert Blankenship

Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005

In Re the Reinstatement of Page

2004 OK 49 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2004)

974 S.W.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

999 S.W.2d 639 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

951 S.W.2d 11 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

113 F.3d 1259 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)

873 S.W.2d 477 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)

Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.

6 F.3d 88 (Third Circuit, 1993)

Dorothy Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Individual David Boggs, an Indiv. Ewing Pollock, an Indiv. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Company Consol-Land Development Company Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Ewing Pollock and the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, in No. 92-3380. Paul Kent Mabel Kent, in No. 92-3437 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk James McIntyre Glenna McIntyre in No. 92-3438 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. Mike Wilson, an Ind. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Mark E. Headlee Charlotte Headlee, in No. 92-3439 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Dorothy Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co., Consolidation Coal Co., the Monongahela Railway Co., Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Rheinbraun U.S. And Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk, in No. 92-3444. Dorothy Loughman, in No. 92-3445 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Larry Levine Dan Levine Morris Levine Edward Levine, Individuals and Morris Levine Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation and Levine Iron and Metal, Inc., a Corporation v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Larry Levine, Dan Levine, Morris Levine, Morris Levine Enterprises, Inc., and Levine Iron and Metal, Inc., in No. 92-3446. James E. Hughes Linda L. Hughes, in No. 92-3447 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. William Reese, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. And Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. John W. Yesenosky, Jr. Linda M. Yesenosky, in No. 92-3450 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. William Reese, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Thomas J. Allen, Esquire, Personal Representative of the Estate of John T. Throckmorten, in No. 92-3451 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk

6 F.3d 88 (Third Circuit, 1993)

United States v. William James McAlpine

919 F.2d 1461 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)

Edward Caudill v. Will T. Scott, Circuit Judge, and Pike Circuit Court

857 F.2d 344 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)

United States v. Gilbert Nelson, No. 87-5529. United States of America v. George Shamy, No. 87-5561

852 F.2d 706 (Third Circuit, 1988)

United States v. Gel Spice Co., Inc.

601 F. Supp. 1214 (E.D. New York, 1985)

United States v. Dickens, Albert, United States of America v. Pittman, Fred, Jr., United States of America v. Washington, James, United States of America v. Persons, Lonnie, United States of America v. Upshaw, Dewey, United States of America v. Cooper, Robert, Robert Cooper, A/K/A Mubarak Rai Ali, United States of America v. Monroe, Keith, United States of America v. Conerly, Alvin, Alvin Conerly, Also Known as Hijr, United States of America v. Lawson, Willie Lee, Willie Lee Lawson, A/K/A Acqueel, United States of America v. Grey, Claude, Ahmed Muhammad, A/K/A Claude Grey, United States of America v. Skinner, Raymond, Raymond Skinner, Also Known as Rafeeq, United States of America v. Thompson, Walton Earl, United States of America v. Clark, James, United States of America v. Brunson, James, United States of America v. Kreps, Sheldon, United States of America v. Moses, Rosco, United States of America v. Dickens, Ronald

695 F.2d 765 (Third Circuit, 1983)

United States v. Dickens

695 F.2d 765 (Third Circuit, 1982)

Dow Chemical Company, Texas Division v. National Labor Relations Board

660 F.2d 637 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)

National Labor Relations Board v. Robin American Corporation

654 F.2d 1022 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)

Stumes v. Solem

511 F. Supp. 1312 (D. South Dakota, 1981)

United States v. Criden

633 F.2d 346 (Third Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 U.S. 905, 89 S. Ct. 1013, 22 L. Ed. 2d 216, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akin-distributors-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1969.