Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles

C.D. California

Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles

DecidedJanuary 14, 2022

Docket2:21-cv-08959

StatusUnknown

This text of Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles (Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-08959-RSWL-DFM Document 4 Filed 01/14/22 Pagei1of1 Page |ID#:81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-08959-RSWL (DFM) Date: January 14, 2022 Title Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles

Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge | Nancy Boehme Not Present | Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) for Petitioner: Attorney(s) for Respondent: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

On November 24, 2021, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause within twenty-eight (28) days why the Petition should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim and under the abstention doctrine set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). See Dkt. 3. That time has now elapsed, and Petitioner has neither responded to the Court’s order nor requested an extension of time to respond. Accordingly, Petitioner is ordered to show cause within twenty-one (21) days why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond to this order may result in a dismissal of this action. A filing responsive to the Court’s November 24, 2021 order is sufficient to discharge this order.

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk: nb Page 1 of 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case 2:21-cv-08959-RSWL-DFM Document 4 Filed 01/14/22 Pagei1of1 Page |ID#:81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-08959-RSWL (DFM) Date: January 14, 2022 Title Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles

Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge | Nancy Boehme Not Present | Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) for Petitioner: Attorney(s) for Respondent: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

On November 24, 2021, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause within twenty-eight (28) days why the Petition should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim and under the abstention doctrine set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). See Dkt. 3. That time has now elapsed, and Petitioner has neither responded to the Court’s order nor requested an extension of time to respond. Accordingly, Petitioner is ordered to show cause within twenty-one (21) days why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond to this order may result in a dismissal of this action. A filing responsive to the Court’s November 24, 2021 order is sufficient to discharge this order.

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk: nb Page 1 of 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Akili B. Al Saif Allah v. Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akili-b-al-saif-allah-v-superior-court-of-the-county-of-los-angeles-cacd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack